- #IF I USE STITCHER LISTEN LATER WILL I BE STREAMING HOW TO#
- #IF I USE STITCHER LISTEN LATER WILL I BE STREAMING DOWNLOAD#
* Includes it's own advertisements on top of the ads already in the podcasts themselves. Some things that turned me off of Stitcher:
#IF I USE STITCHER LISTEN LATER WILL I BE STREAMING DOWNLOAD#
Their whole business model seems to be to scrape other people's content, download it, compress it, serve it up from their own servers and slap additional ads on it. I have tried, and own, almost all of the major podcast apps and it was my least favorite experience so far. I'm curious to hear what you specifically like about Stitcher.
Podcasts aren't so popular yet that the market is crowded, listeners hang around for a long time, and they seek out podcasts for fill time in their day, rather than your content having to compete with other tasks that demand more active attention. Video requires too much active engagement, and is too expensive to produce. Email newsletters perform well but there is no doubt that processing email is a chore for most. There is just a deluge of content and playing the sharing game is hard work, and visitors bounce. Blog posts are of course super competitive. It's really hard to match this with another channel, IMHO. If you put out a high quality podcast you can get into the ear of your target market every week, and they are even going to seek you out. I don't think enough is made of the fantastic marketing channel that podcasting is. Other have already nailed the main points driving adoption: simplified workflow and the desire to fill dead time (driving is mentioned in the article for me it is cleaning the house.)
#IF I USE STITCHER LISTEN LATER WILL I BE STREAMING HOW TO#
SiriusXM’s potential acquisition of Stitcher could give it the pieces it needs it then needs to figure out how to put those pieces together.I've recently gotten into podcasts, using Stitcher as my app of choice (which is ok, but not great - any suggestions for Android alternatives?) Meanwhile, SiriusXM has scale but it needs a coherent podcast strategy to compete with iHeart and Spotify. In general, Stitcher needs scale to avoid getting lost as the podcast industry grows, a fate that befell various early digital music pioneers such as eMusic (which predated iTunes for paid music downloads by five years) and Rhapsody (which predated Spotify for interactive streaming by six). Some of SiriusXM’s broadcast shows-which have tens of millions of listeners-could be made into podcasts the same way as iHeartMedia and NPR have done with theirs. SiriusXM already has a significant presence in podcasting through its ownership of Pandora, which has become a popular podcast app in its own right, and its acquisition, just last month, of the podcast publishing tool Simplecast.
Yet SiriusXM could open up a completely different future for Stitcher and its components. Two years ago, Pandora launched a classification and recommendation engine for podcasts that’s analogous to its groundbreaking Music Genome Project for music. And as for discovery and recommendations, the “Pandora for podcasts” is now. Paid subscriptions to podcasts haven’t taken off yet and may never become more than a niche business, at least in the U.S. As a podcast app, Stitcher had been, by some measures, the only one with double-digit market share besides Apple Podcasts, but now Spotify has that distinction. Midroll’s ad sales capabilities have gotten competition from technology-based startups such as Acast, but especially from iHeartMedia with its enormous ad sales force from broadcast radio. But as the podcasting audience reached mainstream levels, Stitcher didn’t reach leadership positions in any of these models. In other words, Stitcher was early in implementing most of the models that are emerging for podcasting as it becomes a more mature business. Spring 2023 Layoff Tracker Meta First Citizens Bank Axe Hundreds Of Jobs
0 kommentar(er)
